Psycho-Philosophical Issues Facing the Mens Rea Requirement for Legal Culpability
When it comes to determining a criminal culpability during court proceedings, jus- tice systems have traditionally favored actions and consequences over intentions. Advances in the fields of psychology and psychiatry, however, are reasserting the importance of mental status in determining culpability, which has begun to challenge our current understanding of justice. This article explores how the mental states that fulfill the mens rea requirement are particularly problematic given that they rely on psycho-philosophical assumptions concerning free will and moral cognition that are unstable at best. The article discusses how these findings may require change in the legal system and suggests future avenues of research.
LicenseAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).