The Decline and Fall of the Western Roman Empire
A Historiographical Essay
This article analyzes the historiographical trends and the impact of archaeological discoveries on historical research since the late twentieth century. It argues that the inclusion of material evidence in scholarly research led to a revisionist movement within the field, wherein Edward Gibbon’s theory of catastrophic decline was rejected in favor of theories of transformation and continuity based on discoveries from archeological digs. However, around the early twenty-first century, counter-revisionist scholars returned to the older theory of decline and supported their conclusions with the addition of archeological evidence. It strives to prove that these significant historiographical shifts were a direct result of newfound, material evidence and that historians combined it with a bottom-up approach to construct an explanation for the collapse of the Western Roman Empire that is steeped in social, cultural, and material evidence from the everyday lives of Roman citizens.
LicenseAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).